Future of Food Essay

In the passed couple of decades, the diets we deem to be natural or of the Earth are instead Genetically Engineered. The boundary Genetically Engineered does not mean that the entire vegetable or nutrition is fake solely rather means that there is at to the lowest degree one genetically modified ingredient in the regimen that is change all over stores, which raises a great health reverence for some(prenominal) deal. In the feature production of the documentary subsistn as The in store(predicate) of Food looks at how modern day technology has changed the diet we imbibe and the effects it can take on on our health.In watching this need about all the advancements that scholarship has come to in the world with the prov stopping pointer existence eaten e genuinelyday, both the positive and negative effects of all those scientific changes, its only right to think of the countries that barely nonplus decent food for thought in general or the great deal who are losing their livelihoods because of the advancements created by science in stolon world countries.A first world agricultural like the United States has not only a great nitty-gritty but also cumuluss of variety of nutrition however, even this is nonoperational not becoming to satisfy such a wealthy community because steps are still being taken to continue to reform nature. Projects were done that tendinged produce corn in all kinds of different alter and creating bigger than normal sized strawberries. A motion seems to arise, is all this scientific advancement necessary?Are we as a society victorious unnecessary measures to fix something that is natural and worked since the beginning of time? In the medical examination world, many health problems have been examined where food and nutrition were identified as partial contributors to the problem. This film helped in explaining how enzymes are used to knick corn desoxyribonucleic acid and how foreign DNA was then presented into the corn cell walls. Consuming the genetically modified corn caused allergic re characterizationions and stirred a health concern about labeling genetically modified foods.In my particular assent it should be the peoples right to know whether the food theyre ingesting has been alter genetically or tempered with from its natural state. Nevertheless, this does not belittle the question as to why it is necessity to alter the food in the first place. In order to formulate a ground based opinion I need to weigh the positives and negatives. Natural food always has the realise of being natural, however, genetically engineered foods sometimes has the advantages of flavor more(prenominal) appealing, tasting come apart and/or having a longer lasting flavor.I have go through this first hand I have grown a dislike to certain organic foods simply because they middling didnt sagacity virtually as good as those that are genetically engineered even though the organic foods were supposed to be fresher and of course natural. This certain savouring for food could just be that I got too used to the taste of all the preservatives that go into foods. Its interesting how I got used to chemically preserved foods and genetically engineered tastes that overtime became the good tasting ones while the well-grounded ones were rejected by my taste buds.Another benefit is that genetically engineered foods fire up being cheaper because they have a greater resistance to environmental conditions that would normally spoil the unaltered form and are also do in quantities not given the same(p) attention organic foods are given to be fresh and ripe. Being that they are made in greater metre, they are available for more people for cheaper prices, becoming the food of choice. The question would be, are the quantities made and the decrease in prices good enough to outweigh the negative effects of genetically engineered food?Another guide and question would be why do many countries still tolerate unfed and continue searching for methods to feed their fast growing populations if these genetically engineered foods are produced in such a surplus manner? belongings the advantages of genetically engineered foods in mind, there are definitely several noteworthy disfavours too. An advantage was the surplus of food, however, how is it a benefit if such foods are harming the consistence?Some would agree that it is better to feed and raise a healthy smaller sized population with natural, unaltered forms of food than to infect a large population and have them suffer from the repercussion caused by the food they had consumed. Also, most people that are not keeping up with this domain of a function of work do not know that there are these bodies that have consumed the modified foods for such prolonged time periods and have overtime credibly developed immunity to the side effects the modifications can have. In these genetically engineered foods the DNA is altered, and just as changes in human DNA wiz to disorders, consumption of foods with altered DNA may have the same smuggled effects.Certain genetic modifications can even go as off the beaten track(predicate) as cause cancers and brain and organ damage. A huge disadvantage that most people do not notice, especially those who live in urban areas, is that due to the production of the genetically altered foods a lot of farmers have been put out of jobs. These farmers are not needed as very much anymore because more crops can be made for cheaper and because they no longer make as much money on each crop they plant and sow as they once did, as was shown in Central American countries.Now days, while technology could be helping the economy by decreasing the price of foods for people, it is also harming people who depended on the unaltered food to bring them income. The U. S. economy and industry is choosing quantity over quality, which is not beneficial to our health but instead just our wallets . I believe that its not fair for people not to know what is in their foods and usually people dont seek food that can hurt them, therefore, it was crucial that the Genetically Engineered Right to Know act get passed.It would allow people to know what they are consuming from the labels on the foods and therefore prevented conditions that couldve risen from individuals allergic to a modified substance. The Department of gardening and the Food and Drug Administration is supposed to be on crystallize of the foods produced and their effects. Nevertheless, it seems that genetically modified foods dont cause enough of a significant threat in order for them to take action and incumbrance the advancement, rather than promote it and seek ways to improve it.What would bring this publication to a flashing red alert? Though I admitted that genetically altered food does taste better, I still do not agree with the fact that I am consuming and enjoying the taste of sick food. People often loo k for the most ripe fruits and healthy looking vegetables when they go shopping, but for a lot of produce these bigger fruits and vegetables end up being the modified ones. Though I personally have only been able to see the advantages of these foods, I realize that the disadvantages outweigh the benefits of having genetically modified foods.From a realistic point of view, being a schoolchild on a low work out it would be unpractical for me to purchase anything but the cheap genetically altered food. Looking even at the bigger picture, many individuals and families have the same outlook I do. Therefore, many people may be against the genetic modification of food, yet not much course of action will be taken. People are cosy with their life styles, making the cases and effects of modified foods not seem like such a big deal. This shows that the wrong approach is probably being taken to bring this to significant awareness.To promote foods that are not outlet to be altered, there nee ds to be ways to produce the same great quantities and keep prices affordable under the economic conditions of the country and the budget of the average American Family. It was crucial to pass an act that will help identify the genetically engineered goods but still it is not sufficient enough to solve the issue at hand. This matter is truly a very controversial issue, containing both pros and cons therefore, we as a government and a familiar society we need to take a stand and incorporate more ideas in to solving this domestic problem.