Aristotle On Ridicule :: essays research papers

In book Four, Chapter Eight of the Ethics, Aristotle applies his philosophical ideals to the concept of liquid body substance and good compevery. He establishes categories and kinds of humor or wit, and sets limits for the behavior that a gentle humankind and a sassy man entrust accept. At one point, however, he makes the admission that its hard to define when ridicule is suppress. Because multitude react to ridicule in different ways, according to their temperament.This paper will examine the second dissever of Book Four, Chapter Eight, to determine what it is about ridicule that causes Aristotle to break away from his chronic method of analysis to consider other ways of looking at the problem. Specifically, the question of why Aristotle says that correctitude in ridicule eludes definition will be considered. The problem is that Aristotle defines ridicule in a later discontinue of the same paragraph, in a way that seems non to admit any acceptable potpourris.When looking at good and bad company, Aristotle considers it entirely in terms of entertaining conversation, such as humor, wit, or ridicule. He argues that adaptability in the way we talk to people is desirable, since there is a time and a place for everything. The paragraph begins with indirect definitions of two extremes of humor, the buffoon and the humorless person. A buffoon would rather be a fool and hurt peoples feelings than fail to raise a laugh. A man who never cracks a joke is also falling short of the appropriate behavior, which is the gentlemans ability to give and take gentle humor in a conversation. A wit is someone whose pleasantries do not go too far, and is always ready with a witty stimulation or a pleasant joke...as to the middle state in dealing with the humorous,particularly characteristic of that is social tact oraddress, which whitethorn be defined as the gift of saying justthe sort out things for a gentleman to say and of getting others to say such things to him.This seems to be the meaning of good or bad company, where a person gives and takes merriment in conversation with others, according to the situation and the subject.Aristotle defines ridicule, he says that it is a form of abuse or slander, and slander in certain circumstances is command by law. How can there be any propriety in a form of abuse or slander? Aristotle seems to suspend the contradiction, going on to say that the proper gentleman will regulate his own behavior.